The Thread Spread

- Raunchy Banshee-

Porting Not Sporting
The Question - I have a friend who has a Banshee. The guy before him had an idiot port the jugs. Now the motor will not perform to its potential because the barrels were decked 3 mm. If we use a 3 mm spacer plate will that help get the port timing back to were it should be? What about rasing the port heights 3 mm extra to compensate? The jugs have a Duncan(copy) port jug performed over the jackleg one. It also has +4 mm rods(and a spacer for that as well). So, what about a 7 mm spacer plate?
The Response - What do you mean when you say "will not perform to its potential?" Is there something that's not working correctly? Attach a degree wheel to the crank and check the port timing - it will help you sort out your options - and it just might give you a better idea of why it doesn't seem to perform well. What rods are being used in that motor that are 4 mm longer than standard? The RD 400 rods are a pretty standard replacement for the Banshee rods - especially when making a 370 cc long rod engine. The RD rods are 5 mm longer than the Banshee pieces. Boring the cylinder out to 66 mm, using Blaster pistons allows for an almost perfect set up - actually removing a small amount of material from the bottom of the cylinder is what's needed. Re cut the Blaster piston tops to make them work well.
 
Decking the motor - by itself - does nothing to the port timing - that is - removing material from the top of the barrel. Removing material from the bottom of the barrel will lower the ports. It's pretty unusual for a barrel to be decked that much - and even more unusual on a Banshee which is a zero deck motor. Especially when you consider it is using longer than stock rods. Without appropriate piston pin offset to compensate it would rise above the bore at TDC - removing additional material from the top of the barrel would worsen this condition. If this motor has long rods and a spacer plate to compensate for the additional length, the port timing would be the same as it started. There would be no timing changes do to the increased rod length - as long as the spacer plate + additional gasket = the added length of the rod. I don't get why the barrels were decked at all.
 
The edge of the piston can come above the cylinder liner at TDC in a 2 stroke engine as long as the head has an additional relief cut for this. If the top ring doesn't cross the edge of the cylinder it will work ok. Sometimes fixes are made this way. Is there a chance that there is a piece of information missing here?
 
Rick
 
 
 
I agree with Rick, sounds like somebody used this motor as a science experiment or something. Thought it would be neat to throw a bunch of stuff at it and see what it would do. Should probably get some new barrels and start over. The long rod Banshee isn't a bad set up. Like Rick said, use the RD 400 (However Hot Rods might be coming out with an application specific long rod for the Banshee). In fact I talked to Tony at Tony Doukas Racing (the guy the built my crank) and he is trying to get Kurt to build long rods for these things. Anyway, I think that your friend needs to get new jugs, stick with the long rods and blaster pistons, this is not a bad set up in itself, but the cutting of the deck and adding a spacer to compensate sounds pretty "mickey mouse" to me. Later.
 
Eric
 
 
 
 
The barrels have been ported twice by two different people. The first time the BOTTOM of the barrels were decked 3 mm. This lowered the port timing. My question is would it be better to add a 3 mm spacer plate in addition to the new long rod plate(we are now using +5 mm rods with a standard piston) or to just raise the port heights an additional 3 mm to compensate for the decking? We are trying to get the motor to run right with the new port specs.
 
Get a Blaster piston to go with the long rod. This will allow you to take advantage of the long rod. Don't put spacers in, what is the point of decking the barrel, then putting a spacer in to put it back where it was. The only way to get the full potential out of this motor, since it was probably set up to run a long rod with a blaster piston, is to get a set of Blaster pistons. This will move the wrist pin up far enough on the piston to alleviate the need for a spacer plate. You don't want a spacer plate, you want a set of Blaster pistons. I would guess that you could add a 3 mm spacer to make up for the barrel decking, this will probably help a ton. Good luck. Later
 
Eric
 

 

 
Alright, two different people have worked on this motor. The first was an idiot, the second was pretty decent. We cannot use blaster pistons because we cannot go that big at some of the tracks(legally). So that is why we use the spacer plate and the stock pistons. We found out after all this work was done(port, rods etc.) that the first guy had decked the barrels. So this was throwing off the port timing, evident by the performance. We cant just get new jugs, to much into these, we just want these to work.
 
 
Here's what I would need to figure this out better - a degree wheel reading - the port timing. With the lower barrels and the long rods with the Banshee pistons, I'd guess the pistons are hitting TDC at about the handlebars <g>.
 
Give me something to work with here - otherwise get a few base plate spacers of different thicknesses and start testing.
 
Rick

Back to The Thread Spread index of articles.

MacDizzy | 2 Stroke Engines | Glamis Sand Dunes | TRX Specs | TRX Dyno | TRX 270cc Engine | TRX Intake & Shifter | Two-Stroke Software Review | Blaster Rebuild | 2 Stroke Cylinder Mapping | Basic Porting | Yamaha Personal Watercraft | Engine Building Formulas | Glamis Beach Store | Glamis 99 | The Thread Spread | Soccer


Date Last Modified: 4/24/99
Mystery Achievements, Ink™© 1991-1999 - MacDizzy© 1993-1999